
Analysis of Factors Affecting The Level of Survival of Fishermen in Jangka District, Bireuen Regency
Return: Study of Economic And Business Management, Vol 2 (6), June 2023
Hypothesis Test Results
There are four hypotheses proposed in this study, namely two hypotheses to see the
influence of living assets, and life strategies on the sustainability of fishermen's lives. The other
two hypotheses are to look at the effect of vulnerability on living assets, and the influence of
living assets on life strategies. The results of testing the hypothesis can be seen from the estimation
of regression weight parameters (McDonald & Marsh, 1990). Based on the regression weights
value in Table 4, the test results of the five hypotheses proposed can be described as follows:
Hypothesis 1: Increased vulnerability positively affects fishermen's living assets. The
results of statistical testing of hypothesis 1 show an estimated parameter value of 0.549; standard
error value 0.687; critical ratio value 2.800; with a probability value of 0.040. Using a significance
level (alpha) of 0.05, it can be concluded that there is enough empirically strong evidence to reject
H0 and accept Ha. This means that increased vulnerability has a positive and significant effect on
the decline in living assets (Kumala et al., 2013). This shows that the more frequent the storm or
rainy season, the more influential it is on the decrease in the number of fish catches, and this is
related to fishermen's financial assets. This research is in line with (Adhiana, 2016) where in the
study found that vulnerability is directly related to financial assets.
Hypothesis 2: Increased availability of living assets positively affects fishermen's life
strategies. The results of statistical testing of hypothesis 1 show an estimated parameter value of
0.408; standard error value 0.424; critical ratio value 2.963; with a probability value of 0.035.
Using a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, it can be concluded that there is enough empirically
strong evidence to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means that an increase in ownership of
fishermen's living assets has a positive and significant effect on fishermen's life strategies, in line
with research (Khuswati et al., 2022), and (Hidalgo & Cuesta, 2018). This shows that with the
increase in ownership of human assets, physical assets in the form of fishing gear and financial
assets in the form of sufficient capital to go to sea, it increasingly affects the life strategy carried
out by fishermen. The strategy carried out by fishermen is to increase various activities, such as
drying small fish caught, making salted fish, and others, as well as attending various trainings to
improve fishermen's ability to do business. This research is in line with (Adhiana et al., 2019),
Where the ownership of farmers' living assets affects their life strategy. The results of this study
are almost the same as (Rosni, 2017), Roslina, (2009), (Sahri, M., Mashudi, & Sukoharsono,
2011) which gets a connection between strategy and life assets.
Hypothesis 3: Increased ownership of living assets positively affects the sustainability of
fishermen's lives. The results of statistical testing of hypothesis 1 show an estimated parameter
value of 0.073; standard error value 0.456; critical ratio value 2.160; with a probability value of
0.033. Using a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, it can be concluded that there is enough
empirically strong evidence to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means that increasing the ownership
of fishermen's living assets has a positive and significant effect on the sustainability of fishermen's
lives. This shows that an increase in the ownership of human assets such as an increase in the
level of education and experience, an increase in the ownership of financial assets with the
availability of working capital, and the ownership of physical assets in the form of fishing
equipment in the form of outboard motor boats and 5-10 GT motorboats used to catch fish and
fishing equipment such as props, docks, nets, and bubu will improve the sustainability of
fishermen's lives, in line with research (Sati & Vangchhia, 2017), and (Mukherjee et al., 2002).
Hypothesis 4: Improved life strategies positively affect the sustainability of fishermen's
lives. The results of statistical testing of hypothesis 1 show an estimated parameter value of 0.131;
standard error value 0.298; critical ratio value 2.439; with a probability value of 0.040. Using a
significance level (alpha) of 0.05, it can be concluded that there is enough empirically strong
evidence to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means that improving fishermen's life strategies has a