E-ISSN: 2963-3699
P-ISSN: 2964-0121
Homepage: Homepage: https://return.publikasikupublisher.com
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
RESEARCH ON BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP STRATEGY,
CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Didik Suyatno
1*
, Susilo Toto Rahardjo
2
Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, Indonesia
1,2
didiksuyatno031@gmail.com
1
, susilo_tr@yahoo.com
2
ABSTRACT
Supplier-buyer courting method is one of the key elements contributing to the performance of the
pharmaceutical enterprise because it affects the capacity of providers to deliver and steady uncooked
substances for the producing process.The enterprise faces availability issues of uncooked substances in
phrases of time and amount required because of delays in deliver from providers (inconsistent
uncooked cloth deliver and delivery), this trouble is getting worst because of low and fluctuating
forecast accuracy conditions. The phenomenon of the COVID-19 pandemic also worsened the
condition of the availability of raw materials because the pandemic caused a shortage and disruption of
raw material supply. This have a look at is a qualitative have a look at with descriptive evaluation from
interviews consultant informants of consumers and providers. The cause of have a look at is to
research the important thing elements that impact dating techniques between providers and consumers,
in the long run contributing to enterprise continuity and performance. The effects of this situation have
a look at highlight motivation factors, dedication and obligation factors, consider and reputation
factors, courting factors, communique and statistics sharing factors, agreement factors, fine and
reliability factors, overall performance evaluation factors, help control factors, and procurement
strategies. Factors are key factors in a buyer-dealer courting approach to make sure and make sure the
provision of uncooked substances in enough quantity, timeliness and fine, contributing to commercial
enterprise continuity and overall performance.
Keywords : Relationship Strategy; Commitment; Trust and Reputation; Quality and Reliability;
Pharmaceutical Industry
INTRODUCTION
The performance and business continuity of companies, including pharmaceutical
companies, are highly dependent on the availability of raw materials to meet the needs of their
production processes (Belhadi et al., 2021). Regarding the availability of these raw materials,
the pharmaceutical industry faces time and quantity availability problems due to delivery delays
(inconsistent delivery of raw materials) exacerbated by unpredictable and variable conditions
(Rahmani et al., 2022).
The existence of the COVID-19 pandemic phenomenon worsened the condition of the
availability of raw materials because the pandemic caused a shortage of raw materials and
disruption of raw material supply because the majority of raw materials came from imports and
China as the source of the pandemic, became the largest contributor to the country of origin of
the raw material source (Timotius et al., 2022). This influences the provision of those uncooked
materials. The above troubles can in the long run have an effect on making plans and scheduling
of the manufacturing process, in the long run impacting the to supply the very last product to the
consumer and the continuity and continuity of the company's operations (Eldem et al., 2022).
In addition to the background of the practical issues discussed above, there is a theoretical
dimension to previous research studies that have identified supply chain sustainability as a
competitive advantage in an ever-changing global environment (Alfalla-Luque et al., 2018;
Vanpoucke et al., 2014). According to Emamisaleh and Rahmani (2017), sustainability is the
procedure of growing all modern wishes or strength destiny satisfy personal interests.
Improvement are key troubles for the pharmaceutical enterprise, and interest to this difficulty is
visible as essential difficulty deliver chain, so the pharmaceutical enterprise ought to make sure
suitable relationships among providers and customers (Delmas & Pekovic, 2015). In addition,
Rashed et al. (2010) discovered that the connection among shoppers and providers has a sturdy
effect on company performance, and that the buyer-dealer dating is, the extra responsive the
dealer is to the wishes of the buyer's company (Cannon, 2014). Esfahbodi, et a, (2017) reviewed
Research on Buyer-Supplier Relationship Strategy, Contribution to The Company’s Business
Development
1152 Return: Study of Economic And Business Management, Vol 2 (11), November 2023
sustainability techniques and concluded that manage gadget can efficaciously improve company
sustainability. Furthermore, it ought to be referred to buyer-supplier relationships out to be an
fundamental a part of control obligations and are vital to cost introduction and advanced overall
performance in lots of companies (Rungsithong et al., 2017). Wishes with skills to be (Croxton
et al., 2001). The above explains the significance of constructing strategic relationships among
consumers and suppliers (Ernawati et al., 2023).
In different words, motivation to lessen costs, shorten delivery times, lessen investment,
gather middle technology, and decrease purchasing uptime, iterative processes, and negotiation
costs. Rashed et al., 2010. Christiansen et al. (2003) argue the significance of communique and
data sharing, which includes the sharing of performance data (Jaaske¨ainen, et al. (2021);
Tachizawa et al., (2015) Highlighting the significance of help from Vanpoucke, E. and
Vereecke, A.,2010, mentioned the significance of governance and agreement equity elements
over dating revel in and price savings.Morgan and Hunt (1994) assessed the impact, that's
corroborated through research through Ivens and Pardo (2007) and Barrat and Oliveira (2001),
wherein a dedication to long-time period collaboration plus a trust thing is supported through
adding (Cerić, Vukomanović, Ivić, & Kolarić, 2021).
The above problems create problems the availability of uncooked substances in phrases
of each time, and quality, and as supported with the aid of using preceding studies,
pharmaceutical enterprise buyers and suppliers, To make sure the continuity of deliver of
uncooked substances from the factor of view (Wallace & Webber, 2017).
For this reason, it is of great interest, answering questions, analyzing what factors need to
be developed to build relationships between suppliers and buyers, and determining the
importance of quantity, volume, topicality and quality (Lin & Shen, 2022). More qualitative
studies and studies are needed to determine the availability of raw materials from a perspective.
Ensuring company continuity and performance and complementing the results of previous
studies (Lapko, Trucco, & Nuur, 2016).
RESEARCH METHOD
Method uses qualitative approach as it uses a variety of materials obtained from potential
data gathering activities, namely in-depth interviews (Franco & Pinho, 2019). The tool aims to
receive qualitative data with a wider range of information in the form of informant responses
from buyers and suppliers (Viio & Grönroos, 2016). The data sources for this study were
primary data, which included primary data in the form of in-depth interview data from 3
representative buyer informants and 5 supplier informants; It also includes secondary data,
recorded documents, photographs, cooperation agreements and fixed information from
procedures, etc (Moshtari, Altay, Heikkilä, & Gonçalves, 2021).
The data obtained were qualitatively analyzed and described in descriptive form. The data
analysis approach in this study uses the procedure presented by Burhan, B(Burhan, 2022). and
begins with collection, reduction, presentation, validation, and confirmation of conclusions.
Yin, Robert K, (2015) describes five stages for analyzing interview data: (1) assembly or
assembly, (2) disassembly or disclosure, (3) reassembly (and assembly), and (4) interpretation.,
and (5) explained the conclusion.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
This qualitative with reference of previous surveys, we found that factors that contribute
to the relationship strategy between buyers and suppliers are motivating factors (Mitra & Datta,
2014). The main motivation for the relationship strategy between buyers and suppliers is to
build long-term mutually beneficial cooperation partners, ensure the availability of raw,
timeliness, and find alternative suppliers (Soh, Jayaraman, Yen, & Kiumarsi, 2016). Providing
solutions by supporting development. A backup strategy to ensure reliability and stability
(Colmenar-Santos, Muñoz-Gómez, Rosales-Asensio, & López-Rey, 2019). New product
development projects to support product supply, price cuts or cost reductions, and sustainable
cooperation (Minagawa, 2023).
Research on Buyer-Supplier Relationship Strategy, Contribution to The Company’s Business
Development
1153
Return: Study of Economic And Business Management, Vol 2 (11), mont 2023
The second factor is the factor of commitment and responsibility (Asrar-ul-Haq,
Kuchinke, & Iqbal, 2017). Commitment can provide confidence in the fulfillment of the
respective responsibilities of both parties. From the supplier's side, of responsibilities and
promises to supply in accordance with the quantity, time, quality requested, determined and
agreed upon as well as according to the lead time and from the buyer's perspective, of
responsibilities from the aspect of obligations, especially payment terms, etc. With this
principle of responsibility, a shared commitment will be built which will eventually build trust
between the two parties, both and long-term will be established (Wang, Shi, & Barnes, 2015).
Next important factor is trust. This, as mentioned above, has evolved from a consistent
process in the history of the relationship between suppliers and buyers to fulfill their obligations
and responsibilities, and is called reputation (Ağan, Kuzey, Acar, & Açıkgöz, 2016). A
reputation is built from the historical consistency of this relationship (Gao, Hu, & Bose, 2017).
This reputation shows how customers can trust the supplier. In relationship history, if a supplier
has a good history or reputation a buyer, it means that the supplier trusts the buyer more and
more, vice versa Conversely, if the supplier has a bad reputation and a bad experience makes it
impossible to build a relationship of trust, the buyer's trust will decline. Ultimately, that trust
and reputation can build that loyalty and loyalty as a solid foundation for your relationship
strategy between buyers and suppliers (Sarwar, Abbasi, & Pervaiz, 2012).
The next element is the relational enjoy element received from beyond interactions
among customers and providers in which this builds the muse for a cooperative courting
strategy (Zeng, 2022). Negative interpersonal reputations, which consists of breaking promises,
have a horrible impact on relationships, and vice versa, a excessive exceptional personal
popularity offers capital in constructing long-term buyer-provider relationships.
The next crucial aspect is the conversation which to be executed in a two-manner and
obvious manner. From the dealer side, we need to convey exclusive data associated with the
deliberate uncooked cloth wishes in phrases of quantity, time and specs needed, etc. which
include the improvement of new merchandise and from the client miles was hoping that data
associated with supply reality is received according the quality, quantity, time, required.
Communication and sharing of this data may be very crucial due to the fact it could construct
agree with and remove ability misunderstandings among the 2 parties. If misunderstandings are
decreased or minimal, this may additionally decrease the ability for war among suppliers and
buyers. In addition, two-manner and obvious conversation may have an effect on approaches
with a purpose to be extra efficient.
The agreement equity component may be very crucial the customer and supplier courting
as it regulates the rights and responsibilities of events. Contracts also are beneficial for
decreasing repetitive sports such as negotiations and might keep time and costs. Contracts also
are crucial as a reference resolving issues that arise, due to the fact as a reference in resolving
disputes or conflicts among 2 events. The period of the agreement is 6 months to twelve months
with the aid of using binding the amount, time, quality, payment, etc. that are agreed with the
aid of using events consistent with the description above is the ultimate settlement at this time,
speciall due to the fact miles dominated with the aid of using the rate component that
modifications in no time at this time. This agreement component is a continuation and
dedication of events which is mentioned in a proper and written shape in order to ultimately
construct a good courting among 2 events (Love, 2017).
Another critical component in constructing a courting among a dealer and a purchaser is
the component of best and versatility due to the fact this could growth accept as true with which
can in the end attain sustainability the courting among the purchaser and dealer. This best
component is a non-negotiable circumstance or as a minimum requirement. Best, flexibility is
likewise very critical. Flexibility manner being capable fast and be aware of modifications in
uncooked material wishes because of fluctuations in marketplace demand (Ganzer, Chais, &
Olea, 2017).
The next aspect is the overall dimension this is performed transparently and the want for
sharing records associated with the dimension effects to the supplier. This is crucial as it has an
Research on Buyer-Supplier Relationship Strategy, Contribution to The Company’s Business
Development
1154 Return: Study of Economic And Business Management, Vol 2 (11), November 2023
effect on growing agree with and loyalty due to the fact there are overall performance measures
which are used as a reference for non-stop development of each quality, service, etc. wherein
this can have an effect on non-stop development of the connection among shoppers and
suppliers.
Top control help is crucial problem in a long-term courting method amongst customers
and carriers because it has an impact as true with and determination amongst the 2 activities,
the volume of and reality that activities are real and function a responsible determination in
building a courting method for supplier.
The sourcing approach aspect is crucial aspect. This aspect is associated with the dealer
evaluation and qualification system wherein this system establishes the minimal necessities for
providers for you to deliver uncooked substances. Suppliers who've the standards launched are
providers who can deliver uncooked substances due to the fact they may be blanketed as a
seller listing at the buyer's side after passing the seller evaluation degree. Then continue to the
dealer qualification degree wherein the outcomes of the dealer qualification system can be used
as a connection with decide the primary desire of providers to deliver uncooked substances
according with the mounted standards, in order that that is aspect constructing long-time
cooperative relationships between customers and providers each from deliver and demand,
price, excellent and such as deliver reliability.
CONCLUSION
Based on this qualitative research process, it can be concluded that there are 10 factors
that contribute to the courting technique amongst buyers and carriers to ensure deliver of
uncooked materials which in the long run contribute to the company's industrial average overall
performance, particularly cause factors, determination and responsibility factors, agree with and
reputation factors, interpersonal courting factors, verbal exchange and facts sharing factors,
settlement factors, fine and versatility factors, average overall performance appraisal factors,
manage resource factors and technique sourcing factors.
The insurance and managerial implications which can be generated are that it is hoped
that this research can provide input, mainly for the Pharmaceutical Industry as a patron and
moreover a issuer to enforce comprehensively and comprehensively the factors that contribute
to the method of long-term cooperative relationships simply so on the identical time beneficial
partnerships are constructed for occasions.
REFERENCES
Alfalla-Luque, R., Machuca, J. A. D., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2018). Triple-A and competitive advantage
in supply chains: Empirical research in developed countries. International Journal of Production
Economics, 203, 4861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.020 Google Scolar
Barratt, M., & Oliveira, A. (2001). Exploring the experiences of collaborative planning initiatives.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 266289.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030110394932 Google Scolar
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Gunasekaran, A., Ndubisi, N. O., & Venkatesh, M. (2021).
Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned
from the automobile and airline industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163,
120447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120447 Google Scolar
Christiansen, P. E., Rohde, C., & Hald, K. S. (2003). Differences in Supply Chain Performance Across
Interorganizational Communication Levels: Case researches from Denmark. Global Journal of
Flexible Systems Management, 4(4), 2330. www.giftsociety.org Google Scolar
Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2015). Resource Efficiency Strategies and Market Conditions. Long
Range Planning, 48(2), 8094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.014 Google Scolar
Eldem, B., Kluczek, A., & Bagiński, J. (2022). The COVID-19 Impact on Supply Chain Operations of
Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Sustainability 4.0 Based on SenseAdaptTransform
Framework. Sustainability, 14(10), 5855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105855 Google Scolar
Emamisaleh, K., & Rahmani, K. (2017). Sustainable supply chain in food industries: Drivers and strategic
sustainability orientation. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1345296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1345296 Google Scolar
Research on Buyer-Supplier Relationship Strategy, Contribution to The Company’s Business
Development
1155
Return: Study of Economic And Business Management, Vol 2 (11), mont 2023
Ernawati, E., Maulani Muchtar, A., Anwar, V., & Norhaedah, N. (2023). The Relationship Between
Service Quality, Perception of Expediency with The Decision of Go-Ride Service Users in
Makassar. Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines, 2(4), 312321.
https://doi.org/10.57096/return.v2i04.84 Google Scolar
Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., Watson, G., & Zhang, T. (2017). Governance pressures and performance
outcomes of sustainable supply chain management An empirical analysis of UK manufacturing
industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 6678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.098
Google Scolar
Ivens, B. S., & Pardo, C. (2007). The Impact of Governance Mechanisms on Relationship Quality:
Effects in Key Account and Non Key Account Dyads. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4),
14701482. Google Scolar
Jääskeläinen, A. (2021). The relational outcomes of performance management in buyer-supplier
relationships. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107933.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107933 Google Scolar
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.
Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 2038. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302 Google Scolar
Rahmani, M., Romsdal, A., Sgarbossa, F., Strandhagen, J. O., & Holm, M. (2022). Towards smart
production planning and control; a conceptual framework linking planning environment
characteristics with the need for smart production planning and control. Annual Reviews in Control,
53, 370381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.03.008 Google Scolar
Rashed, C. A. A., Azeem, A., & Halim, Z. (2010). Effect of Information and Knowledge Sharing on
Supply Chain Performance: A Survey Based Approach. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain
Management, 3(2), 6177. https://doi.org/10.12660/joscmv3n2p61-77 Google Scolar
Rungsithong, R., Meyer, K. E., & Roath, A. S. (2017). Relational capabilities in Thai buyer-supplier
relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(8), 12281244.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2017-0027 Google Scolar
Tachizawa, E. M., Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2015). Green supply chain management approaches:
drivers and performance implications. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 35(11), 15461566. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2015-0023 Google Scolar
Timotius, E., Sunardi, O., Soenandi, I. A., Ginting, M., & Sabini, B. (2022). Supply chain disruption
in time of crisis: a case of the Indonesian retail sector. Journal of International Logistics and Trade,
20(2), 78101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JILT-05-2022-0004 Google Scolar
Vanpoucke, E., Vereecke, A., & Wetzels, M. (2014). Developing supplier integration capabilities for
sustainable competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Operations
Management, 32(78), 446461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.004 Google Scolar
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to Finish. Guilford publications. Google Scolar
Ağan, Yavuz, Kuzey, Cemil, Acar, Mehmet Fatih, & Açıkgöz, Atif. (2016). The relationships between
corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 112, 18721881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.090 Google
Scolar
Asrar-ul-Haq, Muhammad, Kuchinke, K. Peter, & Iqbal, Anam. (2017). The relationship between
corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Case of Pakistani
higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 23522363. Google Scolar
Burhan, Amira. (2022). Medical Education Research Priorities for Master’s Students in Sudan: A
Qualitative Study. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(1), 89115. Google Scolar
Cannon, James Andrew. (2014). Third party inclusion in consumer complaint processes: Consumers’
motivations and expectations. Saint Louis University. Google Scolar
Cerić, Anita, Vukomanović, Mladen, Ivić, Ivona, & Kolarić, Sonja. (2021). Trust in megaprojects: A
comprehensive literature review of research trends. International Journal of Project Management,
39(4), 325338. Google Scolar
Colmenar-Santos, Antonio, Muñoz-Gómez, Antonio Miguel, Rosales-Asensio, Enrique, & López-Rey,
África. (2019). Electric vehicle charging strategy to support renewable energy sources in Europe
2050 low-carbon scenario. Energy, 183, 6174. Google Scolar
Franco, rio, & Pinho, Cláudia. (2019). A case study about cooperation between University Research
Centres: Knowledge transfer perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(1), 6269. Google
Scolar
Ganzer, Paula Patricia, Chais, Cassiane, & Olea, Pelayo Munhoz. (2017). Product, process, marketing and
organizational innovation in industries of the flat knitting sector. RAI Revista de Administração e
Research on Buyer-Supplier Relationship Strategy, Contribution to The Company’s Business
Development
1156 Return: Study of Economic And Business Management, Vol 2 (11), November 2023
Inovação, 14(4), 321332. Google Scolar
Gao, Baojun, Hu, Nan, & Bose, Indranil. (2017). Follow the herd or be myself? An analysis of
consistency in behavior of reviewers and helpfulness of their reviews. Decision Support Systems,
95, 111. Google Scolar
Lapko, Yulia, Trucco, Paolo, & Nuur, Cali. (2016). The business perspective on materials criticality:
Evidence from manufacturers. Resources Policy, 50, 93107. Google Scolar
Lin, Chih Kuan, & Shen, Kai Shuan. (2022). Exploring the O2O (online to offline) marketing design of
electric vehicles based on consumers’ emotions. SN Applied Sciences, 4(8), 208. Google Scolar
Love, Nigel. (2017). On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 113147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.001 Google Scolar
Minagawa, Yoshiteru. (2023). Management Accounting for Digital Twin-Driven New Product
Development in a Sustainable Supply Chain. In Sustainability Management And Network
Management (pp. 141160). World Scientific. Google Scolar
Mitra, Subrata, & Datta, Partha Priya. (2014). Adoption of green supply chain management practices and
their impact on performance: an exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. International
Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 20852107. Google Scolar
Moshtari, Mohammad, Altay, Nezih, Heikkilä, Jussi, & Gonçalves, Paulo. (2021). Procurement in
humanitarian organizations: Body of knowledge and practitioner’s challenges. International
Journal of Production Economics, 233, 108017. Google Scolar
Sarwar, Muhammad Zaman, Abbasi, Kashif Shafique, & Pervaiz, Saleem. (2012). The effect of customer
trust on customer loyalty and customer retention: A moderating role of cause related marketing.
Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(6), 2736. Google Scolar
Soh, Keng Lin, Jayaraman, K., Yen, Teoh Su, & Kiumarsi, S. (2016). The role of suppliers in establishing
buyer-supplier relationship towards better supplier performance. International Journal of
Productivity and Quality Management, 17(2), 183197. Google Scolar
Viio, Paul, & Grönroos, Christian. (2016). How buyerseller relationship orientation affects adaptation of
sales processes to the buying process. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 3746. Google Scolar
Wallace, Michael, & Webber, Lawrence. (2017). The disaster recovery handbook: A step-by-step plan to
ensure business continuity and protect vital operations, facilities, and assets. Amacom. Google
Scolar
Wang, Cheng Lu, Shi, Yizheng, & Barnes, Bradley R. (2015). The role of satisfaction, trust and
contractual obligation on long-term orientation. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 473479.
Google Scolar
Zeng, Jing. (2022). Orchestrating ecosystem resources in a different country: Understanding the
integrative capabilities of sharing economy platform multinational corporations. Journal of World
Business, 57(6), 101347. Google Scolar