P-ISSN: 2964-0121
E-ISSN: 2963-3699
Homepage: https://jurnalreturn.staiku.ac.id
34 This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
RELATIONSHIP OF FACILITIES AND COMPENSATIONT TO
PERMATA SEJAHTERA BEKASI FOUNDATIO EMPLOYEES
PERFORMANCE
Ari Widi Prakasa
Doctoral, Economics ,Borobudur University ,Indonesia
Ariwidi.prakasa@untara.ac.id
PAPER INFO ABSTRACT
Received: 14th
January 2023
Revised: 17th
January 2023
Approved: 20th
Januari 2023
Research purposes; (1). To determine the effects of existing work facilities
on the performance of foundation employees. (2). To determine the effects of
employee compensation on the performance of foundation employees. (3).
To determine the effects of work facilities and work compensation together
on the performance of foundation employees. By using research methods,
quantitative research approaches. In a process to find problems related to
science using data in the form of mathematical and statistical numbers, as a
means and tools to analyze the data collected as desired. Result: There is a
significant effect between means and compensation on employee
performance. There is a simultaneous influence of the means and
compensation variables have a significant effect on employee performance.
Means and compensation are proven to be able to partially mediate that can
affect employee performance in the Permata Sejahtera Foundation Bekasi.
KEYWORDS
Facility Relationship, Compensation, Performance, Employees
INTRODUCTION
Facilities and facilities that can be used as tools in achieving certain goals. Infrastructure
is also a facility, for everything to be the main support for the implementation of a goal.
(Njoroge et al. 2015). Facilities and facilities become things that make it easier and to facilitate
the implementation of efforts in the form of object equipment (Kurnia et al. 2019). In this case
learning facilities and services, which can be improved learning media facilities and equipment.
It is very possible that learning facilities and services are a factor and have a big role in
improving the quality of learning (Nugraha, Baidi, and Bakri 2021). Learning activities are
two-way communication activities between teachers and students, so facilities and services are
needed to support learning, such as learning media, classes, and textbooks, resources. In the
learning process which consists of several components that influence each other. These
components are teachers and students, curriculum in the form of subject matter, learning media,
and so on.
Learning facilities, are all that is needed in the learning process, both dynamic and static,
to achieve goals, and all so that it runs smoothly, regularly, and measurably, effectively and
efficiently (Priambodo 2016). All facilities for learning are things that are needed by students
to achieve learning goals through learning activities in the form of educational reinforcement
to better understand, about the problems faced. Facilities as equipment and equipment that can
be directly used and support the learning process, which is specifically used directly in the
learning process. Such as classrooms, toilets, prayer rooms, tables and chairs, as well as
learning equipment and facilities that can directly support the learning process such as empty
spaces, school gardens, fajalan to school but if utilized directly for the teaching and learning
process such as school gardens used by schools for learning (Supiana, Hermawan, and Hilmy
2018).
The function of learning facilities is everything that supports the smooth learning process
"So it can be concluded, about facilities and other facilities, for school learning is very
Relationship Of Facilities And Compensationt To Permata Sejahtera Bekasi Foundatio Employees
Performance
35 Return: Management Studies, Economics and Business, Vol 2 (No 1), Jan 2023
important for the learning process and also to support the quality of education (Apandi 2018).
With various completeness of learning facilities and facilities in class and school that are
available to be utilized, and can also support the learning process activities, which of course
will help students in improving the quality of school achievements. Facilities and infrastructure
are everything that can facilitate and facilitate the implementation of an effort in the form of
objects.
One of the employees' performance can be seen from the level of employee discipline.
Performance is a function of motivation, skills and role perception (Liswandi 2017). State that
performance is the achievement of the results obtained from certain job functions or activities
over a certain period of time. That performance is the process by which organizations evaluate
or assess employee performance. (Hasmalawati and Restya 2017) Provides a definition that
performance is the result of work that has been achieved by a group of employees in a company
organization, in order to achieve a company organizational goal, within a predetermined period
of time. So performance must refer to the achievement of the tasks assigned to employees in
the company. So performance is the results of a person's job function or as a group in a company
organization, which has an impact on various factors for the achievement of the company's
organizational goals.
Compensation is everything that employees receive in return for their work, and
compensation itself can be divided into two, namely direct compensation and indirect
compensation. Direct compensation includes salaries, bonuses/incentives, commissions
(Rahman 2017). Meanwhile, indirect compensation includes holiday allowances and health
benefits. Whereas in developing and implementing a compensation/reward system, the
interests of the organization and the interests of employees absolutely need to be taken into
account. The purpose of compensation to be more effective is to produce more qualified human
resources and other resources, to be able to retain employees in a company to be comfortable
and productive, and the company is able to be fair, in accordance with the performance of the
employees themselves, in controlling costs, and in accordance with applicable rules and
regulations (Wahjono 2015). Compensation with finances from all income in the form of
money or other forms, received by employees of the foundation in return for their services and
achievements provided to the foundation (Firmandari 2014).
METHOD
In this study using a quantitative approach. By producing findings obtained by statistical
and mathematical procedures through measurement data, to be analyzed, there is an influence
between variables expressed in numbers. Based on the level of explanation of the position of the
variables, this study is causal associative, Has the aim of wanting to know the effect between
two variables or more than variables. Acording to Sugiyono, in (Ristanti 2022). This study will
analyze an influence between the variables studied, namely the effect of facilities and services
on customer satisfaction, and compensation on employee performance.
Data Collection Techniques
In this study the techniques used to collect data are as follows:
a. Questionnaire method for data collection by means of the subjects studied fill out the
questionnaire that has been provided by the researcher (Creswell 2002). In this study, the
data collection instrument used the Likert attitude scale concept. This model was developed
by Rensis Likert, in this model it is more widely used for research on psychology (morals),
attitudes and so on. On this Likert scale respondents will answer the statements that have
been made by the researcher by giving a cross. From the respondent's answer, a score is
then given. Giving weights or scores arranged in a consistent level. In this study, there are
5 types of answer points given. Assessment is measured scoring based on a Likert scale.
Relationship Of Facilities And Compensationt To Permata Sejahtera Bekasi Foundatio Employees
Performance
36 Return: Management Studies, Economics and Business, Vol 2 (No 1), Jan 2023
b. Research Variables (1). Independent Variable (X1). An independent variable is a variable
and as such cannot be influenced by other variables. The other independent variables in this
study are: Facilities. Compensation
c. Independent Variable (Y). The dependent variable which is a variable with conditions that
depend on and are affected by the conditions of other variables. While the dependent
variable is the performance of foundation employees.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Data Description
With a quantitative approach, conducting data analysis which includes data
processing and data presentation, to perform calculations in describing data analysis to test
hypotheses using statistical tests. Presentation of data and data analysis, through data
obtained from the field, and then presented in tabular form, and made a graph (Sardi
2017:87). With the ultimate goal to be achieved in research using quantitative methods, to
test the theory with facts has shown the relationship that is compared between variables, by
describing statistical tests, and predicting the results (Nurlan 2019). As an analysis of the
research data, it is intended to determine the hypotheses that have been formulated in the
previous discussion, namely whether there is an influence of facilities and compensation on
the performance of Permata Sejahtera Foundation employees. paired test). The two-sample
dependent test calculations are presented in two forms, namely: manual calculations and
using SPSS version 26.
B. Hypothesis Testing and Discussion
Respondents were taken from 40 employees of Yayasan Permata Hati Bekasi, the
majority of whom were women aged 20-35 years. We provide questionnaires based on
indicators that have been made by the author.
1. Validation Test
Table 1. The results of testing the validity of employee performance
No
Indicator
R-count
R-table
1.
Kk1
,600
,313
2.
Kk2
,425
,313
3.
Kk3
,760
,313
4.
Kk4
,750
,313
5.
Kk5
,745
,313
6.
Kk6
,525
,313
7.
Kk7
,845
,313
8.
Kk8
,825
,313
9.
Kk9
,645
,313
10.
Kk10
,680
,313
Based on table 1 above on employee performance (Y) there are 10 question items
used in answering these variables. With these 10 question items, there is no reduction in
question items and it turns out that with the Pearson bivariate test the value generated for
each question item is r count greater than r-table, then the question is declared valid.
Table 2. Results of testing the validity of the Means
No
Indicator
R-count
R-table
Description
1.
S1
0,540
0,312
True
2.
S2
0,460
0,312
True
3.
S3
0,729
0,312
True
4.
S4
0,830
0,312
True
Relationship Of Facilities And Compensationt To Permata Sejahtera Bekasi Foundatio Employees
Performance
37 Return: Management Studies, Economics and Business, Vol 2 (No 1), Jan 2023
No
Indicator
R-count
R-table
Description
5.
S5
0,560
0,312
True
6.
S6
0,470
0,312
True
7.
S7
0,410
0,312
True
8.
S8
0,775
0,312
True
9.
S9
0,795
0,312
True
Based on table 2 above on the means (X1) there are 10 question items used in
answering these variables. With these 10 question items, there is no reduction in question
items and it turns out that with the Pearson bivariate test the value generated for each
question item is r count greater than r table, then the question is declared valid.
Table 3. Compensation validity test results
No
Indicator
R-count
R-table
Description
1.
k1
0,570
0,312
Correct
2.
k2
0,345
0,312
Correct
3.
k3
0,710
0,312
Correct
4.
k4
0,575
0,312
Correct
5.
k5
0,430
0,312
Correct
6.
k6
0,335
0,312
Correct
7.
k7
0,590
0,312
Correct
8.
k8
0,685
0,312
Correct
9.
k9
0,775
0,312
Correct
10.
k10
0,385
0,312
Correct
Based on table 3 above on compensation (X2) there are 10 question items used in
answering these variables. With these 10 question items, there is no reduction in question
items and it turns out that with the Pearson bivariate test the value generated for each
question item is r count greater than r t table, then the question is declared valid.
2. Reliability Test
No
Variable
Cronbach’s Alpha
R-critical
Description
1.
Means
,815
,6
Worth
2.
Compensation
,740
,6
Worth
3.
Employee
performance
, 875
,6
Worth
Based on table 4 shows that in this study using 3 variables of means, compensation
and performance. All of these variables have a Crobach's alpha value of more than 0.6, so
each variable used can be declared reliable.
3. Classic Assumption Test
No
Variable
Test I
Test II
1.
Assumption Sig
0,605
0,915
2.
Condition
> 0,05
> 0,05
Relationship Of Facilities And Compensationt To Permata Sejahtera Bekasi Foundatio Employees
Performance
38 Return: Management Studies, Economics and Business, Vol 2 (No 1), Jan 2023
No
Variable
Test I
Test II
3.
Information
Normal
distribution
Normal
distribution
Based on table 5 by performing 2 tests, the first normality test with an asymp.sig
value of 0.606 and the second test with an asymp.sig value of 0.917 was obtained. The test
values 1 and 2 Then it will be <0.05, so the results can be declared as normally distributed
data.
4. Multicollinearity Test
Table 6. As a test result of multicollinearity
No
Variable
Information
Information
Tolerance
VIF
Means
0,510
1,970
There is no
multicollinearity
Compen
sation
0,510
1,970
There is no
multicollinearity
Based on table 6 the independent variables on means and compensation have a
Tolerance value > 0.10 and a VIF value < 10, It can be said and stated that there is no
multicollinearity.
5. Heteroscedasticity Test Table 7. Heteroscedasticity Test Results
No
Unstandardized Residual
Information
1.
Correlation Coefficient
Free of
heteroscedasticity
2.
Sperman’srho
Mean
Sig (2-
talied)
0,610
3.
N
40
Based on the results from table 7, it shows that the Spearman Rank test results with
the independent variable means (X1) have a significance value greater than 0.005, so it
can be stated that the regression model has the same variance from the residuals or does
not occur.
Table 8. Heteroscedasticity Test Results II
No
Unstandardized Residual
Information
1.
Correlation Coefficient
Free of
heteroscedasticity
2.
Sperman’srho
Kompensasi
Sig(2-
talied)
0,920
3.
N
40
Based on the results obtained in table 8, it shows a significant value for the
compensation variable of 0.920, the significant value of the variable is above 0.05 so it
does not experience heteroscedasticity.
Relationship Of Facilities And Compensationt To Permata Sejahtera Bekasi Foundatio Employees
Performance
39 Return: Management Studies, Economics and Business, Vol 2 (No 1), Jan 2023
6. Hypothesis Test Table 9. Hypothesis test results
N
Variable
Coefficient
R-count
T-Sig
1.
Konstanta
28,653
2.
Sarana
3,758
0,001
3.
F hitung
14,126
0,001
4.
Adjusted
R Square
0,521
0,271
5.
variabel
Koefisien
T Hitung
T Sig
6.
Konstanta
33,939
7.
kompensasi
2,731
0,010
8.
F hitung
7,458
0,010
9.
Adjusted
R Square
0,164
0,142
7. T-test
a. Hypothesis Testing I. Based on the results of the t-test of Table 9, the means variable
directly obtained t count 3.758 with t sig. 0.001 means that the t-sig. 0.001 is smaller
than 0.05, then Ho is rejected, meaning that the compensation variable directly and
partially has a significant effect on employee performance.
b. Hypothesis Testing II. Based on the t-test results from table nine, the compensation
variable directly obtained t-count 2.731 with t-count greater than T-table, it is
rejected, meaning that the compensation variable directly and partially affects
employee performance.
c. Path Analysis. From the results of the t-statistics, it can be concluded that the t-count
value is 2.355 > t-table 1.684, so it can be concluded that the means and
compensation are proven to mediate the effect on employee performance.
8. F-Test
In the F-test, the F-count is 6.950 with a significance of 0.003 meaning that F-sig.
0.003 is smaller than 0.05 then Ho is rejected, meaning that the simultaneous variable of
means and compensation has a significant effect on employee performance.
a. The coefficient of the determinant (R2). Based on the results of the second test, the
value of R Square is 27.3%. This means that the ability of the means and
compensation variable model is able to explain the employee performance variable
by 27.3%.
b. Limitations. The results of this study are that there is an influence of facilities and
compensation on the performance of employees of the Foundation - Permata Hati
Bekasi. From the results of the questionnaire survey conducted by the author to the
respondents. To find out how big the effect is, the author tested it with the SPSS
Statistics 26.0 application
c. Research limitations. This study only uses 2 independent variables studied, namely
facilities and compensation.
d. The method of data collection uses questionnaires and so there is a possibility that
respondents answered not really.
CONCLUSION
Based on the data and discussion that has been carried out above, several conclusions can
be drawn, namely as follows: a) There is some significant influence between work facilities
Relationship Of Facilities And Compensationt To Permata Sejahtera Bekasi Foundatio Employees
Performance
40 Return: Management Studies, Economics and Business, Vol 2 (No 1), Jan 2023
and facilities on employee performance and employee compensation on the performance of
foundation employees. b) There are also influences on employee work simultaneously on the
variables of facilities, facilities and employee work compensation that are very significant to
the performance of employees at the foundation. c) Means, facilities and employee
compensation are proven and real have been able to provide consistent influences on employee
performance at Permata Sejahtera Bekasi Foundation.
REFERENCES
Apandi, Apandi. 2018. “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja
Pegawai Pada Biro Umum Dan Keuangan Universitas Lampung.” Cendekia: Jurnal
Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran 12(1):61–74. Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. 2002. “Desain Penelitian.” Pendekatan Kualitatif & Kuantitatif, Jakarta:
KIK 121–80. Google Scholar
Firmandari, Nuraini. 2014. “Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan
Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri Kantor
Cabang Yogyakarta).” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam 9(1). Google Scholar
Hasmalawati, Nur, and Winda Putri Diah Restya. 2017. “Hubungan Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja
Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Karyawan Di Puskesmas Paya Bakong Aceh Utara.” Jurnal
Sains Psikologi 6(2):63–67. Google Scholar
Kurnia, Efry, Raihanah Daulay, and Fahreza Nugraha. 2019. “Dampak Faktor Motivasi Dan
Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara
Di Kota Medan.” Pp. 365–72 in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kewirausahaan. Vol. 1.
Google Scholar
Liswandi, Liswandi. 2017. “Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja Dan Komitmen Organisasi.” Jurnal
Lentera Bisnis 5(1):50–63. Google Scholar
Njoroge, Sheila Wambui, Josephat Kwasira, S. Wambui Njoroge, and J Kwasira. 2015.
“Influence of Compensation and Reward on Performance of Employees at Nakuru County
Government.” IOSR Journal of Business and Management 17(11):87–93. Google Scholar
Nugraha, Galih Abdi, Baidi Baidi, and Syamsul Bakri. 2021. “Transformasi Manajemen
Fasilitas Pendidikan Pada Era Disrupsi Teknologi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam
7(2):860–68. Google Scholar
Nurlan, Fausiah. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. CV. Pilar Nusantara. Google
Scholar
Priambodo, Ardi. 2016. “Pengaruh Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi
Melalui Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening.” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen 5(1):6–
9. Google Scholar
Rahman, Arrafiqur. 2017. “Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja; Suatu Tinjauan Literatur Dan
Pandangan Dalam Konsep Islam.” Jurnal Ilmiah Cano Ekonomos 6(1):7–22. Google
Scholar
Ristanti, Vivi. 2022. “Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Fasilitas Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien
Non Bpjs Di Klinik Abadi Jaya Depok.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 8(24):603–9.
Google Scholar
Sardi, Sardi. 2017. “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Dan Transaksional
Terhadap Kinerja Bawahan Melalui Kepuasan Kerja.” JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis: Teori Dan
Implementasi 8(1):61–72. Google Scholar
Supiana, Supiana, A. Heris Hermawan, and Muhammad Fawaz Hilmy. 2018. “Manajemen
Sarana Dan Prasarana Diniyah Takmiliyah.” Jurnal Isema: Islamic Educational
Management 3(2):140–58. Google Scholar
Wahjono, Sentot Imam. 2015. “Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.”Google Scholar